Navigating Team Conflict with the Levels of Perspective Model

As a business leader, you’ve likely encountered moments where your team seems stuck in unproductive discussions. Often, the root of this conflict lies in different team members looking at a problem from vastly different perspectives. One person may be focusing on high-level strategy, while another is caught up in technical roadblocks. This disconnect can halt progress and make it difficult to align on a plan of action.

The Levels of Perspective model* offers a structured way to overcome this type of conflict. By identifying and discussing the different levels of focus, teams can come together on the same page, at the same time, with a shared understanding of the problem. 

What is the Levels of Perspective Model?

The Levels of Perspective model helps teams address a problem by understanding and framing their viewpoints across four different “levels.” These levels range from high-level, strategic goals to the smallest, detail-oriented execution issues. Each level corresponds to a different level of focus:

1. Satellite Level: The 30,000-foot view that encompasses big-picture, overarching goals or long-term visions.

2. Helicopter Level: A mid-range perspective, still focused on broad strategies but getting closer to implementation.

3. Hat Level: This represents an eye-level focus, where attention shifts to specific processes or tactical planning.

4. Magnifying Glass Level: The most granular view, zooming in on details such as technical issues or operational hiccups.

Conflict often arises when team members are operating from different levels without realizing it. For example, a manager may be focused on the company’s high-level strategy (Satellite Level), while another team member is concerned about a small technical glitch (Magnifying Glass Level). Both are talking past each other because they are focused on completely different aspects of the same problem.

When Should the Model Be Used?

This model is especially helpful when:

Teams are stuck in discussions: If you notice that your team can’t agree on a direction or solution, it’s often because individuals are focusing on different levels of perspective.

Conflicting priorities: When one person is focused on execution and another on strategy, using this model helps bridge the gap.

Complex projects: The model works well when dealing with projects that involve multiple layers of complexity, such as strategic goals, tactical planning, and detailed technical tasks.

How to Use the Model

1. Identify the Levels of Perspective:
As a leader, begin by asking your team members to identify what level of perspective is required for the meeting. Are they thinking in terms of high-level strategy, or are they zoomed in on a specific task? Encourage them to articulate where they need focus.

2. Establish a Shared Language:
Agree on using the Levels of Perspective terminology within the team. When a conflict arises, you can refer to the different levels—Satellite, Helicopter, Hat, and Magnifying Glass—to clarify where everyone is coming from.

3. Guide the Discussion:
Once everyone understands the levels, guide the discussion by intentionally moving between these perspectives. Start at the Satellite Level to ensure alignment on big-picture goals, then gradually move down through the other levels until you reach the more granular details. This way, all perspectives are covered in a logical sequence.

4. Check for Consensus:
As the discussion moves from broad to specific, check in with the team to make sure everyone agrees and understands before moving to the next level. This ensures alignment at each stage.

Example: A Sales Team Facing Declining Enrollment

Let’s say your sales team is concerned about declining enrollment in a new program. They’ve gathered to develop a campaign to boost enrollment numbers, but discussions quickly become contentious. Here’s how the Levels of Perspective model can help:

– Satellite Level: The team leader begins by addressing the overall objective: “Our goal is to increase enrollment by 20% over the next quarter.” This is the high-level, big-picture goal everyone needs to keep in mind.

– Helicopter Level: A marketing strategist steps in and suggests, “We need a campaign that aligns our messaging with the value propositions that resonate most with prospective students.” This is still a strategic view, but it’s starting to drill down into the approach the team will take.

– Hat Level: Another team member, focused on operational concerns, adds, “We need to identify the key promotional channels and the timeline for running these campaigns.” Now the conversation is transitioning to tactical execution—what actions are needed to achieve the broader strategy.

– Magnifying Glass Level: Finally, a tech team member chimes in with a specific issue, “We have a technical glitch in the enrollment app. Until that’s fixed, all our campaigns won’t lead to actual enrollments.” This is the most granular concern, addressing a critical detail that must be resolved before the broader strategy can succeed.

At this point, the team is stuck because one group is focused on the app issue (Magnifying Glass Level), while others are still discussing high-level strategy (Satellite and Helicopter Levels). Using the Levels of Perspective model, the leader can help the team align by recognizing where each person is focused. They may start by addressing the big picture (Satellite Level) and then agree to move down the levels, eventually prioritizing the technical fix (Magnifying Glass Level) once everyone is aligned on the broader goals.

Aligning Perspectives for Productive Collaboration

The Levels of Perspective model is a powerful tool for resolving conflict and driving effective discussions within teams. By identifying where each team member is focused—whether it’s on high-level strategy or minute details—you can guide conversations toward alignment and progress. Whether dealing with operational issues or strategic challenges, using this model will help ensure that your team stays on the same page, moving forward together.

*Adapted from Chris McGoff, The Primes: Levels of Perspective

---